agnos.is

The agnos.is blog

Published: 2024-02-09T19:16:00+01:00

I have long thought I needed to launch a new website. It's been a long time since I actually hosted a home page of any sort. Currently, the main HTTP website of agnos.is points at a static “Hello World” page, which isn't super useful to tell people about. So, now I have decided to put up a basic web page about myself and my interests. But of course, we can't do it normally.

No no.

This is my first foray into alternate protocols, and my first real interaction with Geminispace. I hope to eventually mirror this website as static HTML, running on HTTP.

https://agnos.is

License: CC-BY-SA-4.0.

Written by: @[email protected]

  • Return to Posts

Published: 2024-02-16T21:35:28+00:00

What is Home?

Home is a place. Home is a feeling. Home is more than one place. Home is where you live currently. Home is where you came from. Home is where your parents or family are. Home is something we can concretely point to, yet also something transient and elusive.

Transience of “Home”

As someone who's lived in 3 countries, home is a VERY transient concept. I call many places home. Some I prefer to call home more than others. Is home the place I've lived the longest? Is it the place I have the strongest connection to? Or is it where my family is? The problem, for me, is that I'm not sure that is where home actually is. We live in a transient situation, in a rental which we cannot stay for much longer. It's too expensive. Everything feels like an “in-between.”

I return often to the place I think of as home. But it feels weirdly emptier each time I go there. Is it a sign that I am finally moving on? That a new place is becoming “home?” But then the old place feels less empty, and the new place more empty. And then it doesn't. Rinse, repeat. I am still stuck in the In-Between. Both physically and metaphorically. This in-between place is the place where two (or more!) choices dangle in front of you, and they continue to hang there, just out of sight, sometimes with fleeting glances in the periphery of your vision.

In this In-Between, you can spend time either running TO the choices, or running AWAY from them. I have been running away from them for a long time, but eventually, they will always catch up to you. And that's happening to me now. Eventually, circumstances of life force one to make a choice.

Acceptance of the Future

The future brings what it brings. We eventually have to make the choice we've been running to or from. Once we make the choice, we have to live with the consequences. They could be good, or bad, or a mix. But what if we have the problem of not wanting to accept any of the consequences or the choices we have before us?

I have to make a decision where to live, soon, and I'm not sure what the best answer is. Many different potential futures will spawn from this one choice, and there are a mixture of good and bad consequences in each choice, at least that I can easily perceive. There's also plenty of unforeseen developments that will result depending on the choice I make. Thinking about this choice and making it a cause of existential dread.

But nevertheless, in the end, the choice must be made. Any number of ways of analyzing the choice can be done. Greatest amount of self-happiness? Greatest amount of net happiness? Purely pragmatic factors like finances or education? All of these factors are important, but also maintain a careful balancing act with emotion and sentiment. In the end, I think home is what we make of ourselves and our situation. The word still can have many meanings, but it is up to us to define what the word means for us, in the current part of our lives. The meaning of “Home” likely changes throughout the decades of our existence.

The only constant is change.

License: CC-BY-SA-4.0.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗

Written by: @[email protected]

  • Return to Posts

Published: 2024-02-09T19:30:00+01:00

Why do we need open source? Why do we need to control our own data? Why do we need free and interopable standards?

I think we are entering a new age of decentralization. After over a decade of the internet transforming from a mostly decentralized place into a few well-known services controlled by large corporations that do not have user interests at heart, regulation is finally starting to catch up to this new world. We owe this change to the efforts of thousands over multiple decades. And ultimately, it all comes back to the tenets of open source and free software.

The Digital Markets Act

The Digital Markets Act of the European Union is the main driver of this change, forcing the large companies like Facebook/Google/Apple to open up their services in such a way that they are interoperable or able to have actual competition.

The Fediverse (the social media sites built on ActivityPub and related protocols) is poised to become a defining trait of this next era of the internet. And it was all made possible by open source and open standards.

Open source software and open standards serve many purposes. But one of the most important ones is that they can and do serve as a bulwark that protects user interests against the interests of the large corporations that are only interested in barely-legal and mostly unethical data harvesting to increase profits. It can definitely be argued that open source has not always been successful in this regard: many people view the open source movement as an obscure fringe group in the world of computing (and they're not entirely wrong). But those people also tend to forget about the success of projects like the Linux kernel, the GNU userland, and Mastodon et al.

The Power of Free Software

Licenses like the GPL and AGPL are a strong shield that protect user interests over the long term, and the GPL has been demonstrably successful in this regard. The “extreme” rules of the (A)GPL have also spawned a host of weaker-but-still-compatible licenses that allow developers to build on the work of others in a permissive manner, for both private and commercial purposes. These other licenses have their ideological roots in the tenets of the GPL, although many of the licenses were created because of an explicit disagreement with the GPL.

Without the ideas behind the GPL, user freedom would likely be compromised to the point of non-existence. When even a company like Meta/Facebook enters the ActivityPub space, the ideas of the Open Source and Free Software movements are working (Arguments against Meta implementing ActivityPub not withstanding). I believe all of the lobbying, drafting, proposals, and effort that have finally brought us the Digital Markets Act eventually are all blossoms that come from the seed of free software and open source.

Free software must continue to exist, and continue to push for the rights of the user, so we do not lose them.

Filed under: open source, ideology

License: CC-BY-SA-4.0.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗

Written by: @[email protected]

It turns out my remote user was only partially stored...

Written by: @[email protected]

More test posting to see if federation between social.agnos.is and blog.agnos.is works.

@[email protected]

Written by: @[email protected]

There is some federation going on with social.agnos.is... But I still cannot follow it?

Written by: @[email protected]

This is a notification to @[email protected].

Written by: @[email protected]

This time for @[email protected].

Written by: @[email protected]

Yet another test post.

Written by: @[email protected]

Here is another test post after forcing federation to the main Sharkey server.

Written by: @[email protected]